Writing the ethical action plan I found to be useful in terms of where to begin with the project, what to consider and do in a practical sense. I had two iterations of the ethical action plan, the first draft being:
Ethical Action Plan Template 2025-26 1.docx
The second and final version:
Final SR Ethical Action Plan Template 2025-26 1
In my first draft of the Ethical Action Plan, I proposed using both questionnaires and document analysis to gather feedback from students and colleagues. My tutor, Carys Kennedy, suggested clarifying what I meant by “document analysis” and recommended focusing on a single method—specifically questionnaires or surveys—since they differ slightly in approach. In response, I revised my plan to concentrate solely on questionnaires, simplifying the data collection process and reducing potential confusion over methodology.
Originally, I intended to directly seek feedback from neurodivergent students and those for whom English is not their first language. My tutor highlighted the ethical implications of collecting this sensitive personal information, recommending that the questionnaire be open to all students, with optional questions about neurodiversity or language background. I incorporated this by making questions on learning needs optional and ensuring responses remain anonymous, which balances inclusivity with ethical safeguards.
My first draft also stated that participants could withdraw consent at any point. The feedback pointed out that if survey data is collected anonymously, it cannot be withdrawn once submitted. I adjusted the wording in my second draft to clarify that participants may stop the questionnaire before submitting their responses, after which their answers remain anonymous and cannot be retracted.
Regarding physical and recorded data, my initial plan mentioned filming hands-on videos and including students, but my tutor asked for clarification on whether recordings were part of data collection. I acknowledged that the videos themselves are not part of the research data; any participation in recordings would require separate informed consent. I also clarified that no physical data will be collected beyond digital questionnaire responses, simplifying the data protection plan.
Reflection:
This feedback helped me refine my Ethical Action Plan to be more ethically rigorous and methodologically focused. By narrowing my data collection to anonymous questionnaires and carefully considering the sensitivity of personal information, I improved the clarity and ethical integrity of my project. The process reinforced the importance of aligning research methods with ethical guidelines while remaining practical and inclusive. I also became more aware of the nuanced differences between data collection methods and how these impact consent, anonymity, and participant protection. Overall, I feel more confident that my revised plan respects both ethical standards and the diverse needs of participants.